-Does James Contradict Paul?

In all of Scripture there are probably no two authors who appear to contradict each other more than James and Paul. Referring to the crucial doctrine of salvation, …

Does James Contradict Paul?

In all of Scripture there are probably no two authors who appear to contradict each other more than James and Paul. Referring to the crucial doctrine of salvation, one seems to be saying that there is nothing a person can do to merit salvation, while the other seems to be saying that a person’s good deeds do play a part in salvation. A significant difference! The fact that Paul says that justification is by faith alone, without works, and James says that justification is by faith with works, certainly seems to be an unresolvable conflict in doctrine (Rom. 3:28; Jas. 2:24).

This apparent contradiction was significant enough for the great reformer Martin Luther to give the book of James a lower status in the canon of Scripture. Some scholars believe that Luther’s position on James has been overstated, but he did refer to the Epistle of James as “a right strawy Epistle.” But how can this be? Both Paul and James were inspired writers. God is the ultimate author of both Romans and James, and God cannot lie. Scripture must interpret Scripture! Are we to suppose that James and Paul are now in heaven reconciling their differences in theology! Or is there a way to harmonize the writings of Paul and James, because as writings in the Bible they cannot contradict each other?

What Paul And James Don’t Say
As a first step in harmonizing these Scriptures, we should observe what both of these inspired writers do not say, as compared to exactly what they do say. Notice that James does not say that good works can save a person, nor does he say that justification results from some kind of mixture of faith and works – like 50% faith and 50% works. What he does say is that faith without works is dead! And he does indicate that good works are definitely associated with saving faith. Notice that Paul does not say that any kind of faith saves a person, nor does he say that saving faith doesn’t result in good works. What he does say is that a person is justified by faith and not by works. And he does indicate that works are not the basis of salvation. So already we see that the writings of James and Paul are not necessarily on a collision course. Although at first they appear to be completely contradictory, they are really not opposite statements at all, nor are they in logical contradiction to each other. In order to clearly understand the teachings of James and Paul, we need to examine what they say more closely.

Perspective is Important
Question: What looks like a square and a triangle at the same time? Quick wrong answer: Nothing, because such a thing is impossible. Thoughtful correct answer: A pyramid. Viewed from the side it looks like a triangle. Viewed from above it looks like a square.

This illustration should help us better understand the statements of Paul and James. When they write about saving faith, they’re not contradicting each other – they are just looking at faith from different perspectives. Paul is looking at faith from above, from the divine perspective. God knows the quality of a person’s faith without having to see the results. Before God, the quality of a person’s faith is not determined by, nor is it dependent upon, good works.

James, on the other hand, is looking at faith from the ground level, from the human perspective. We cannot see the heart, as God can, but we can see the results in the life of a person who claims to have faith. True faith will prove its profession by good works. In other words, the perspective from which saving faith is viewed can determine how faith is defined.

It may appear on the surface that the two definitions of faith contradict each other. But if we consider the two different perspectives, this contradiction can be cleared up. From God’s perspective, the faith that saves is a faith apart from works. From man’s perspective, faith results in good works which people can see.

Abraham As An Example
The fact that both James and Paul used Abraham as an example certainly is significant to our harmonizing of these texts. Note that both authors quote Genesis 15:6 as a part of their argument: “Abram believed in the Lord; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness.” It is important to see how each author uses this verse in his argument. Paul’s point is that Abraham was declared righteous by God even before he was circumcised (a work of obedience) and long before the Law was given. In other words, there’s nothing Abraham did to earn his salvation. He just believed God: “If Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about; but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? ‘And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness’” (Rom. 4:2-3).

James’ point, on the other hand, is that Abraham’s faith was proved by his works. “Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered up Isaac his son on the altar? You see that faith was working with his works, and as a result of the works, faith was perfected; And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, ‘Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness,’ and he was called the friend of God” (Jas. 2:21-23). But notice closely that James does not say that Abraham’s works of faith resulted in God’s declaration of Abraham’s righteousness. No! The declaration was made in Genesis 15:6, about 30 years before his work of faith of offering up Isaac (Gen. 22). That’s why James says precisely that “the Scripture was fulfilled that says ‘Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness’” (Jas. 2:23).

So we see that there really is no contradiction between James and Paul. The works of Abraham were essential, not because they had some kind of intrinsic merit to justify him, but because they proved or manifested the genuineness of his faith. The point is clear in the minds of both Paul and James, that Abraham was justified in God’s sight long before any works of righteousness were performed.

More From Paul
When considering what Paul has to say about the relationship between faith and works, it is important to bear in mind what he wrote about in his other epistles. For example, in Galatians 5:6 Paul wrote, “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love.” This last phrase, “faith working through love,” sounds a lot like James, doesn’t it? No way was Paul opposed to good works! It’s just that they must be seen for what they are – evidence of saving faith, not the essence of saving faith.

When we rightly quote the well-known verses of Ephesians 2:8-9 as a proof text against the false teaching of salvation by works, let’s not forget that Paul also wrote the very next verse as well: “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). Clearly, Paul is not against good works. The purpose of his treatise to the Romans was to destroy any idea that a person might be justified on the basis of meritorious works. Mankind can do absolutely nothing to merit favor with God. We are saved on the by-grace-through-faith basis alone (Eph. 2:8).

More From James
When thinking through what James says about the relationship between faith and works, there is another important point to keep in mind. The works that James presents as examples from the lives of Abraham (2:21-23) and Rahab (2:25) are anything but good works. Apart from faith, these works were attempted homicide (Abraham) and treason (Rahab)! These works are a far cry from what we normally consider good works, such as helping the homeless. These “works of faith” of Abraham and Rahab were not meritorious good works because apart from faith, they would certainly not qualify as good works at all. So it is obvious that James is not arguing that the works of Abraham and Rahab added to their faith. His point is that the works of Abraham and Rahab proved that their faith was genuine – the works were a result of their already existing faith.

It is also very important to notice how James begins his discussion of faith and works: “What use is it, my brethren, if a man says he has faith, but he has no works? Can that faith save him?” (Jas. 2:14). In other words, anyone can say they have faith, but such a profession may be words only. Can that kind of faith save a person? The answer is obviously a resounding, “No!” A faith that gives mere intellectual assent only is no better than the belief of demons, as James goes on to say in James 2:19. Certainly that kind of faith cannot save a person, because it is a counterfeit faith. Then what kind of faith can save a person? James answers that question. It is a faith that shows itself to be genuine by works of obedience. The works themselves do not participate in the process of justification, but they are evidence of the kind of faith which is necessary for justification. The heroes of faith of Hebrews 11 did not just say that they had faith, and they did not just have a belief about God in their heads. No! Their faith involved their hearts as well as their heads, and evidenced itself by “works of faith.” Those works did not save them, but gave solid evidence of their true and saving faith.

An Approach For Evangelism
The different approaches taken by Paul and James to the faith/works question is a good way to evangelize different individuals today. For those individuals who think that they must earn their way to heaven or that they are not good enough for heaven, we could share the truth of Romans – that salvation is apart from works. On the other hand, if certain “loose-living” individuals think they are on their way to heaven because they “went forward” or “raised their hand” or “signed a card” or “prayed the sinner’s prayer” at an evangelistic crusade when they were young, we should share the truth of James with them. Faith which does not manifest itself with an obedient lifestyle should be questioned, because faith apart from works is not a genuine faith – it is a dead faith.

So Paul and James do not contradict each other. As inspired writers, their statements do harmonize. Justification is not by works – it is by faith alone. But justification is not by faith which is alone. Saving faith is not a dead, cerebral, inactive faith. True saving faith is a faith that results in a life of obedient works. Saving faith is a faith that works!

By David Reid

With permission to publish by: Sam Hadley, Grace & Truth, 210 Chestnut St., Danville, IL., USA.



1 Comment on -Does James Contradict Paul?

  1. Bravo! I have been a part of this conversation with a few friends recently and it is great to see these two perspectives harmonized.

    It seems the ‘ground level’ and ‘divine perspective’ dichotomy may also play a part in those ever-recurrent discussions about free-will and pre-destination as well.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: